Trang chủFormula 1Guenther Steiner compares Madring backlash to Las Vegas debut with 2027 warning

Guenther Steiner compares Madring backlash to Las Vegas debut with 2027 warning

Q: Madring là gì? A: Madring là trường đua mới của Madrid đăng cai Grand Prix, gây tranh cãi vì cuộc đua đầu tiên hầu như không có pha vượt xe trên đường. Key facts: - Kimi Antonelli thắng chặng Madring nhờ cửa sổ VSC, không vượt trực tiếp trên đường. - Guenther Steiner so sánh Madring với Las Vegas 2023 và cảnh báo không thể có năm thứ hai như thế này. - Madring có hợp đồng 10 năm với F1. - Antonelli dẫn bảng với 8 chiến thắng, hơn George Russell 81 điểm. Source: The Red Flags Podcast, mùa giải 2026. Related Q&A: Q: Vì sao Madring bị chỉ trích? A: Vì cuộc đua đầu tiên diễn ra theo kiểu rước kiệu, gần như không có pha vượt xe trên đường. Q: Madring có thể sửa trước 2027 không? A: Khó, vì cần thay đổi hình học đường đua và chờ FIA phê duyệt trong 12 tháng. Q: Antonelli đang dẫn đầu giải như thế nào? A: Anh có 8 chiến thắng, bỏ xa đồng đội George Russell 81 điểm.

When the checkered flag fell at Madring last weekend, the data log recorded virtually no direct overtaking during the entire race. Kimi Antonelli did not win by forcing his car past the one ahead; he moved into the lead through a perfectly timed Virtual Safety Car window in the pit lane. For Guenther Steiner, that detail matters more than raw emotion: it proves that Madring, Madrid's new circuit, cannot produce a real race. Steiner, the former Haas team principal who now works as a pundit on The Red Flags Podcast, compared the Madring backlash to the Las Vegas Grand Prix debut in 2026. That year Las Vegas was heavily criticized after a loose drain cover damaged Carlos Sainz's car in the first practice session. Two years later, Steiner admitted Las Vegas now feels as if it has been there forever. He used that precedent to urge patience, but his warning was unmistakable: there cannot be a second year like this. Madring was introduced as a landmark circuit tied to a 10-year race contract. That means nobody can simply walk away after one failed season. The problem lies in the track architecture: the sequence of corners, straight lengths and braking zones do not create a natural passing point. Drivers can stay within one second using DRS, yet they cannot complete a pass because there is no deeply late braking zone. This is the classic DRS train mechanism - a line of cars following each other with no one able to advance. Based on my experience of watching circuits for 44 years, a good overtaking point needs a long enough straight after a low-speed corner. At Madring, the straights do not appear to create the necessary speed differential, so every attacking move is smothered before it can form. The result is a processional race where pit strategy and the timing of a virtual safety car decide everything. The clearest evidence comes from how the win was decided. Antonelli took the lead after a VSC window, not through an on-track pass. Lando Norris, starting from pole, lost position without being overtaken in a conventional way; Max Verstappen moved up to second through the race's flow. The data suggests overtaking was almost impossible, and VSC luck became the main variable. On a properly functioning circuit, a driver can close up, pick a braking moment, and turn distance into opportunity. At Madring, all those variables are compressed into a tedious wait. The championship context makes the issue even clearer. Antonelli just claimed his eighth win of the 2026 season, stretching his lead over teammate George Russell to 81 points. Lewis Hamilton, now at Ferrari, is third and 101 points behind. A Mercedes dominance cycle normally creates expectation of dramatic chases. But even the fastest car had to wait for a VSC to change position. That shows Madring is not just damaging the race behind; it is distorting the title narrative as well. Critics are split into two camps. One compares Madring to Las Vegas and believes things will improve. The other points to a fundamental difference: Las Vegas needed temporary infrastructure fixes, while Madring needs permanent geometry changes. Reshaping a corner, altering run-off areas, or adding a longer straight are all possible options, but cost and FIA approval make a 12-month deadline extremely tight. Steiner does not say Madrid will fail; he is setting a defining check. If the track still lacks overtaking in 2027, the 10-year contract becomes a commercial burden rather than an asset. Sponsors start asking questions, fans switch off, and the FIA may have to intervene. The data is only one race old, so hasty conclusions would be unfair. But the blind spot is that without action, a small sample can create a lasting prejudice. Las Vegas was once mocked, but that venue could fix drain covers; Madring must fix its own design. The next round in Baku, from September 24 to 26, 2026, will show whether Antonelli keeps extending his lead. The bigger story, though, remains in Madrid. Madring is racing against time to prove it can deliver real racing. If 2027 is still a dull procession, Las Vegas becomes a mocking reminder: a place once criticized can become an icon, but a place that cannot fix itself becomes a lesson.

Guenther Steiner compares Madring backlash to Las Vegas debut with 2027 warning

Guenther Steiner compares Madring backlash to Las Vegas debut with 2027 warning

Guenther Steiner compares Madring backlash to Las Vegas debut with 2027 warning

Cầu thủ liên quan